Traffic Impact Analysis Clause Samples

Traffic Impact Analysis. The TIA has been prepared and submitted to the City. In consideration for Owner’s agreement to construct and pay for the Traffic Improvements and the dedication of the right-of-way as described in this Agreement, the City hereby waives any requirement for Owner to pay any fees or pro-rata amounts assigned or allocated to the Project pursuant to the TIA.

Traffic Impact Analysis. The developer shall submit a new Traffic Impact Analysis to the City, with new or updated concurrency mitigation requirements identified therein, prior to the Project exceeding the Trip Generation Threshold. The scope of the analysis shall be limited to a roadway capacity assessment on roadway segments where trips generated by the Project exceed five percent of the adopted peak-hour directional service volume and an operational assessment on the New Jersey Road Corridor from Edgewood Drive to US 98. Additional transit or trail-based mitigation shall not be required as a result of this analysis, but additional mitigation measures to expand roadway capacity, which may include, road widening, the addition of turn lanes, and signalization (“Roadway Capacity Mitigation”), shall be required to the extent identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis as necessary for the Project to satisfy City concurrency requirements. Roadway Capacity Mitigation, which may be mitigated with proportionate share contribution, shall be provided in accordance with Florida Statute 163.3180. Any operational improvements on the New Jersey Road Corridor identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis as needed to improve existing or background (non-project) deficiencies, or any operational improvements identified in such analysis which does not increase roadway capacity, shall not be a mitigation responsibility of the Developer. However, subject to agreement with the City, these operational improvements may be used as alternative mitigation measures for roadway concurrency mitigation requirements. The costs of satisfying any Roadway Capacity Mitigation, including any alternative mitigation measures agreed to for roadway concurrency mitigation requirements, identified in the analysis shall be impact fee creditable to Developer.

Traffic Impact Analysis. This task will take the results of the detailed traffic modelling in the Phase 2 studies to identify and summarize impacts of the implementation of tolling, and of the proposed improvements which may be supported by tolling. This will include:  Traffic Impact/Diversions. The toll vs. no-toll assignments will be compared to identify the magnitude and specific routes expected to be impacted, based on a volume threshold to be established. Traffic impacts, stratified by passenger cars vs. trucks, will be provided on select routes (and major route segments) which are expected to experience a level above the threshold for both the 2022 and 2045 model year runs.  Impacts on travel time, both in aggregate (net change in VHT) and for typical trips on each tolled corridor.  Changes in average speeds on the tolled routes, with and without tolling as well as with and without the proposed improvements. For corridors with multiple improvements, the net impacts of the improvements will be computed as one comparison between the no-build and the full build alternatives.  Changes in vehicle miles of travel, by vehicle type and route type.  Impacts on motor fuel consumption, computed from estimated changes in VMT by vehicle and roadway type.  Estimates of typical tolls paid by travel category such as commuters, in-state vs out-of-state, trucks vs cars, etc. The results of the travel benefits analysis will be summarized in a technical memorandum for each of the projects/corridors studied in detail.

Traffic Impact Analysis. APPLICANT acknowledges that the average daily trips for a commercial use and agrees that prior to commencing construction of the DEVELOPMENT, to include the issuance of grading or building permits, and even if not otherwise required to do so by law, APPLICANT shall conduct and submit to the City of El Paso Traffic Engineer a Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") that meets the standards set forth in Chapter 19, Article 2, Section 19.18 of the El Paso City Code and the City of El Paso approved guidelines. The City Manager or designee shall evaluate the TIA and make recommendations thereon; and APPLICANT will implement any measures that the City Manager or designee determines are necessary to mitigate any adverse traffic impacts attributable to the DEVELOPMENT on the surrounding public infrastructure; such measures shall be considered Qualified Expenditures under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall APPLICANT be required to incur any cost or expense in connection with such mitigation measures in excess of $600,000.00 in the aggregate.

Traffic Impact Analysis. From Section 7 of Task Order 3 excluded TIS's from this scope of work. • Traffic Impact Analysis is not included with this scope Both Manatee County for the Truck and RV/Boat storage lots and City of Sarasota for the OTA are requiring the following: • Accepted Methodology Statements • Concurrency Applications • Transportation Impact Statements (TIS)

Traffic Impact Analysis. AECOM performed a Traffic Impact Analysis on behalf of Dominion to investigate the potential impacts to traffic operations in the vicinity of the Station that could arise with the introduction of truck traffic related to Project activities. This Traffic Impact Analysis Report is included as Appendix A. Two future scenarios were analyzed for the traffic impact study in order to account for the expected peak truck traffic and an anticipated 5% total increase in traffic volume growth: 1) a 2035 analysis with 82 trucks per hour circulating within the study area and 2) a more conservative 2035 analysis with 100 trucks per hour circulating within the study area. Traffic operations analysis was performed for these two scenarios and the five study area intersections using Synchro software, which is an industry-standard traffic engineering modeling package approved by VDOT and Chesterfield County. The study is based on existing conditions and does not assume the future completion of the projects contemplated by the MOU. A base network was built using existing roadway geometry that included inputs for lane configuration, stop control, design speed and lane width. Heavy vehicle percentages in the count data were adjusted upward according to truck loading for the Project to generate more accurate results for the specific scenario. For each analysis scenario, Synchro generated projections for delays and Levels of Service (LOS). The LOS is a qualitative representation of factors such as flow rate, delays, and driver comfort that reflect how well a facility is serving the traffic demand relative to available capacity. It is generally accepted that the threshold of acceptable LOS for roadways and intersections is LOS C or better for rural conditions and LOS D or better for urban conditions. Based upon this analysis, all turning movements at all study area intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS B or better for all analysis scenarios. There are no significant delays or queuing projected anywhere in the study area for any of the trucking scenarios modeled. Based on the results of operational analysis and the findings of this Traffic Impact Analysis, and coupled with the additional improvement projects contemplated by the MOU described above and other elements of this Transportation Plan, impacts on traffic operations in the vicinity of the Station will be sufficiently mitigated during the Project

Traffic Impact Analysis. The developer shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, a Traffic Impact Analysis, which shall be submitted to the Town prior to site plan approval. Developer shall install all recommended on- and off-site improvements identified in the TIA to mitigate the impact of the Development, to keep US 70A, Meadowlands Drive, and Corporate Drive at an overall Level of Service of C or better, or to maintain their current Level of Service if the TIA shows they are at a D or below, as a result of this development. The improvements are subject to Town and NCDOT approval.

Traffic Impact Analysis. At the time of development, and prior to platting the Property and the issuance of any development permits for the Property the OWNER shall cause a Traffic Impact Analysis (“TIA”) to be performed by a professional engineer acceptable to the CITY to determine capacity in and on the roadways in the vicinity of the Property and the ability of such roadways to support the traffic that will be generated by the OWNER’s proposed development of the Property. Such TIA shall also identify the offsite roadway improvements that must be constructed at a minimum to serve the OWNER’s proposed development of the Property in accordance with the CITY’s Street Design Standards, then in effect. The TIA shall be performed at no cost to the CITY and will be subject to review and approval by the CITY Engineer. The TIA will also be subject to review and approval by the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”) if a TxDOT controlled roadway is involved. The CITY Engineer shall have the right to require the OWNER to perform additional TIA(s), at no cost to the CITY, if a significant amount of time has passed between the date the previous TIA was performed and the date the Property development commences or if the proposed development of the Property changes from the development assumptions contained in the prior TIA or if in the opinion of the CITY Engineer some other change in conditions has occurred which merits re-evaluation of an earlier TIA.

Traffic Impact Analysis. The developer shall submit a new Traffic Impact Analysis to the City, with new or updated concurrency mitigation requirements identified therein, prior to the Project exceeding the Trip Generation Threshold. The scope of the analysis shall be limited to a roadway capacity assessment on roadway segments where trips generated by the Project exceed five percent of the adopted peak-hour directional service volume and an operational assessment on the New Jersey Road Corridor from Edgewood Drive to US 98. Additional transportation demand management mitigation shall not be required as a result of this analysis. The costs of satisfying any mitigation identified in the analysis shall be impact fee creditable to Developer.