Project Abstract Sample Clauses

Project Abstract. ‌ Applications should include a high-quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed project in 400 words or less. Project abstracts should be— • written for a general public audience; • submitted as a separate attachment with “Project Abstract” as part of its file name; and • single-spaced, using a standard 12-point font (Times New Roman) with 1-inch margins. As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the program narrative. The abstract should briefly describe the project’s purpose, the population to be served, and the activities that the applicant will implement to achieve the project’s goals and objectives. The abstract should describe how the applicant will measure progress toward these goals.

Project Abstract. Each proposal should contain a project abstract that summarizes the project objectives and tasks. The abstract should be no more than 200 words and is prepared free form (no RTI form needed). This section of the selected proposal will become part of the Project Agreement; the Abstract should be direct. Use contractual phrases which are definitive, such as – “this project shall”, rather than “we propose to” or “the proposed project will”. The primary value of the abstract is to clearly and succinctly describe the project. The ability to succinctly summarize the work proposed to do help demonstrate the understanding of the project. For successful proposals, the abstract is used to enter a project description into relevant databases, including. • TxDOT's research database(s) • Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) Research in Progress system Implementation (for research projects only) At the university’s option, include a free form section by this title that presents the researcher's assessment of potential areas for application of the research findings, such as changes in specifications, standards, or department policies. If included, this section should also include an assessment of which TxDOT operations will be affected. When deciding whether or not to include an implementation section, consider the project being proposed, and what the project results will look like. If including thoughts about the implementation will better explain the project or knowledge of the area, include the section. For projects expected to produce results which could be implemented either during the progress of the project or shortly after completion, material in this section might include an assessment of several issues. The form in which the findings would be most effectively reported • mathematical model or formula • laboratory test procedure • design techniques The organization logically responsible for application of the results • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) • Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Division or District The specific medium of practice that would be changed or developed by the findings • AASHTO Standard Specifications • TxDOT Standard Specifications • special specifications The best method to convey the research findings to operating personnel for use • circulation of a written report • personal contact with operating personnel • demonstrations • movie, slide, or videot...

Project Abstract. See Section

Project Abstract. See Section 4.1.ix of HRSA’s SF-424 R&R Application Guide. The Abstract must be clear, concise, and without reference to other parts of the application. The Abstract must also contain the following elements:  Applicant’s name  Applicant’s address  Applicant’s Selected Topic Area (from the topics listed in Section I.1 of this FOA)  Principal Investigator (PI) information: Name, degree(s), email address, and phone number  Contact person’s name and email address, if different from the Principal Investigator  Partner organizations, if applicable  Applicant’s web site address, if applicable  A summary of the six (6) research studies or technical assistance initiatives proposed for Budget Year One

Project Abstract. SciTrek is a science education outreach program that is run out of the chemistry department at UCSB, and has partnered with various SBUSD schools since 2012-13 absent a research component. SciTrek’s goals are to 1) allow students authentic science experiences which help them gain a better understanding of the scientific practices, and 2) work with teachers to increase comfort in three dimensional (as laid out in NGSS) science teaching. This study will focus on the effects that SciTrek has on 2nd-8th grade students’ understanding of the scientific practices and their attitudes towards science. SBUSD teachers that choose to participate in the program receive one mini module (1 hour) and 2 full-length modules (~7 hours each) during the course of the school year. Surveys are given at the beginning of the mini module and the beginning and end of each full-length module, resulting in five embedded surveys per year.

Project Abstract. In FY2010 San Antonio Missions NHP entered into a task agreement with the University of Pennsylvania to do the cyclic condition assessment and treatment of the Gothic Column at Mission San José’s convento. A comprehensive condition assessment of the column was completed as per the initial scope of work. Due to the advanced weathering of the column since 1993, a more complex treatment program beyond the initial cyclical treatment is now necessary. This new treatment will require some laboratory testing prior to the development and execution of conservation. In June 2011 the park received the report on the Evaluation of the 1993 treatment of the San ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Column and its recommendations for further work. This request builds on those recommendations.

Project Abstract. Applicant Type

Project Abstract. A one-page abstract should serve as a succinct description of the proposed project and must include the goals of the project; a list of potential subrecipients or contractors that will perform Navigator functions (if known), including those entities that are part of a consortium and consortium or project name (if applicable); the amount of funding requested for each FFE state per each 12-month budget period for which the applicant seeks funding; the population(s) or group(s) that the applicant expects to target, including size of the “left behind” population a Navigator cooperative agreement applicant proposes to reach; an alphabetized list of counties that the applicant proposes to target within each FFE state(s) for which the applicant seeks funding; and a description of how the cooperative agreement will be used to perform Navigator functions as outlined in 45 C.F.R. § 155.210 and § 155.215. The abstract is often distributed to provide information to the public and Congress and therefore should be clear, accurate, concise, and written without reference to other parts of the application. Personally identifiable information should be excluded from the abstract.

Project Abstract. Keywords: Nonlinear optical microscopy, nanoscale imaging, molecular suprastructures, metallic nanostructures, drug screening, fuel cells Abstract: