Critical Path Analysis Sample Clauses

A Critical Path Analysis clause defines the process for identifying and managing the sequence of tasks that directly affect a project's completion date. In practice, this clause requires the parties to determine which activities are on the critical path, monitor their progress, and update schedules accordingly if delays occur. By focusing attention on these key tasks, the clause helps ensure timely project delivery and provides a clear framework for addressing delays that could impact the overall timeline.
Critical Path Analysis. During the period Provider is providing Transition Services, Provider shall maintain a “critical path analysis” for the particular Transition project that will indicate the impact on the Transition project time schedule and Transition milestones based upon any occurrences of acts, omissions or breaches by Provider, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or third parties. Provider’s critical path analysis shall be provided to and reviewed with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ SOW Manager on at least a weekly basis and shall be presented to the Transition Management Committee (or if there is no Transition Management Committee, then the Steering Committee) or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ representative at each meeting during the particular Transition.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Critical Path Analysis. Contractor shall provide with each Time Extension Request a quantitative demonstration of the impact of the delay on completion of the Work and Contract Time, based on the Work Progress Schedule. Contractor shall include with Time Extension Requests a reasonably detailed narrative setting forth: 12.11.3.1 The nature of the delay and its cause due to a change in the Work or an Excusable Delay and the basis of Contractor’s claim of entitlement to an extension of Contract Time. 12.11.3.2 Documentation of the actual impacts of the claimed delay on the critical path in Contractor’s Work Progress Schedule, and any concurrent delays. 12.11.3.3 Description and documentation of steps taken by Contractor to mitigate the effect of the claimed delay, including, when appropriate, the modification of the Work Progress Schedule.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Critical Path Analysis. ‌ As specified in D1.3, section 2.3 Critical Path Analysis, four milestones were set to be achieved by the end of the Project: MS1 Project startup WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP8 LIUC 6 This milestone will be verified in terms of Project coordination setup (WP1); knowledge framework completed (WP2); background knowledge for analysis acquired (WP3 and WP4); basic dissemination infrastructure setup (WP8) MS2 Knowledge framework revision WP2, WP3, WP4, WP8 LIUC 15 This milestone will be verified in terms of first revision of knowledge framework completed (WP2); analytical research setup completed (WP3 and WP4); dissemination infrastructure fully operative (WP8) MS3 Analytical research completed WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7 LIUC 24 This milestone will be verified in terms of analyt- ical research completed (WP3 and 4); exploratory research fully operative (WP5 and 6); integrative modelling fully operative (WP7) MS4 Final knowledge framework release WP2, WP3, WP4, WP8 LIUC 30 This milestone will be verified in terms of final revision of knowledge framework completed (WP2); analytical research setup completed (WP3 and WP4); dissemination infrastructure fully op- erative (WP8) The following decisions of the SB meetings are related to the achievement of these Milestones: • Decision 9. Milestone MS1 has been achieved. • Decision 16. The achievement of the second milestone, MS2, will be decided in an online meeting of the SB, to be held by the end of March 2016. • Decision 19. Milestone MS2 has been achieved. • Decision 34. Milestone MS3 has been achieved. • Decision 38. Milestone MS4 has been achieved.
View Source
Critical Path Analysis. Analysis of the critical path throughout the project evolution reveals the following workpackage’s (Inputs/Outputs) that require particular attention (see ▇▇▇▇▇ Chart). The critical path in time for the EUDEM2 project starts with wokpackage WP200- Requirements & Concepts and the Concept Meeting with the Advisory Panel, in which the project direction and scope will be refined. Task WP330 Information Retrieval Facility is critical by itself. The realization of this task depends on the available information, and the implementation difficulties (interface/software) which are due to the different sources of information (data bases, web sites, etc …) and their coherence/completeness. A GO/ NO GO (M4) review is planned for this task at Month 10. WP400 Technology Survey is critical and depends on the inputs from WP600 Interviews as well as the available scientific/technology information. This is the reason for splitting it into several tasks.
View Source
Critical Path Analysis. ‌ To understand where and when key quality reviews need to take place, a critical path analysis has been undertaken to identify the major dependencies between WPs. This analysis shows the following key milestones [GA – Annex I Part A – 1.3.4. WT4 List of milestones]: MS1 Project startup WP1, WP2, LIUC 6 This milestone will be WP3, WP4, verified in terms of WP8 Project coordination setup (WP1); knowledge framework completed (WP2); background knowledge for analysis acquired (WP3 and WP4); basic dissemination infrastructure setup (WP8) MS2 Knowledge WP2, WP3, LIUC 15 This milestone will be framework WP4, WP8 verified in terms of first revision revision of knowledge framework completed (WP2); analytical research setup completed (WP3 and WP4); dissemination infrastructure fully operative (WP8) MS3 Analytical research completed WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7 LIUC 24 This milestone will be verified in terms of analytical research completed (WP3 and 4); exploratory research fully operative (WP5 and 6); integrative modelling fully operative (WP7) MS4 Final knowledge framework release WP2, WP3, WP4, WP8 LIUC 30 This milestone will be verified in terms of final revision of knowledge framework completed (WP2); analytical research setup completed (WP3 and WP4); dissemination infrastructure fully operative (WP8)
View Source

Related to Critical Path Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer upon delivery of the coal to Buyer’s facility, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its “as loaded” quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Seller’s “as-loaded” quality shall be the Payment Analysis only when Buyer’s sampler and/or scales are inoperable, or if Buyer fails to obtain a sample upon unloading. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and that it finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or industry-accepted changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the tune of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. Each sample taken by Buyer shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer. One (1) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Buyer until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the fifth (5th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. In addition, Buyer shall send Seller weekly analyses of coal unloaded at Buyer’s facilities. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.