Introduction and Summary Sample Clauses

The 'Introduction and Summary' clause serves to provide an overview of the agreement, outlining its main objectives and summarizing the key terms or provisions. Typically, this section briefly describes the parties involved, the purpose of the contract, and highlights the most important obligations or rights established by the agreement. By presenting a clear and concise summary at the outset, this clause helps readers quickly understand the contract’s intent and scope, ensuring clarity and setting expectations for the detailed terms that follow.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Introduction and Summary. The Georgia Department of Corrections shall ensure that proper supervision is provided for all offender detailed from correctional facilities to perform tasks in county courthouse, state patrol barracks, National Guard Armories and other authorized activities.
Introduction and Summary. This grant award is issued under Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended through P.L. 116-131, enacted March 25, 2020. The terms and conditions of this Notice of Award (NoA) and other requirements have the following order of precedence: (1) statute; (2) executive order; (3) program regulation; (4) administrative regulation found in 45 CFR Part 75; (5) agency policies; and (6) Any additional terms and conditions and remarks on NoA. By requesting or receiving funds under this award, the recipient assures that it will carry out the project/program described in its approved 4-year area plan(s) and will comply with the terms and conditions and other requirements of this award.
Introduction and Summary. The intent of this Introduction and Summary is solely to summarize the terms of this Mitigation Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the language set forth in this Introduction and Summary and the terms and conditions set forth in the numbered sections of this Mitigation Agreement, the latter shall control. Capitalized terms are defined below. SoCalGas has entered into a Consent Decree with the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, the Attorney General, and CARB (together, “Government Plaintiffs”) to resolve legal claims against SoCalGas in connection with the natural gas leak from SoCalGas’s Aliso Canyon Natural Gas Storage Facility in October 2015 (“Consent Decree”). This Mitigation Agreement, which is Appendix A to that Consent Decree, includes the terms governing the discharge of SoCalGas’s “Mitigation Obligation” under the Consent Decree, that is, the obligation to mitigate 109,000 metric tons of methane emissions. This Mitigation Agreement fulfills the requirements from Governor ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ January 6, 2016, Emergency Proclamation for SoCalGas to pay for a mitigation program developed by CARB that causes full mitigation, that is limited to projects in California, and that prioritizes projects that reduce short-lived climate pollutants. The Mitigation Projects developed pursuant to this Mitigation Agreement will be dairy-digester biomethane projects, which were proposed in CARB’s March 31, 2016, Aliso Canyon Climate Impacts Mitigation Program and will conform to the Program’s objectives and mandatory project criteria. Pursuant to the terms set forth below, SoCalGas will establish a Mitigation Fund as a trust. SoCalGas will transfer the Mitigation Contribution required under the Consent Decree to a Mitigation Account opened by the Mitigation Fund and serve as initial Administrator of the Mitigation Fund. The function of SoCalGas’s payment of the Mitigation Contribution is to cause full mitigation of the Aliso Canyon leak; it is not a payment in lieu of penalties to CARB (nor is mitigation a Supplemental Environmental Project). The Mitigation Fund will be managed by a Trustee, who will enter into an administrative services agreement with the Administrator. The Mitigation Fund will disburse the Mitigation Contribution to support Mitigation Projects. For the First (Mitigation) Project, the Mitigation Fund will provide partial financing, in the form of loans, to the Dairy Projects, organized into three Clusters, which will capture, upgrade, a...
Introduction and Summary a. Provide an executive summary or general introduction of the progress that has been achieved for the reporting period. b. Limit 1 page.
Introduction and Summary. This deliverable D1.1, “Variability in material and energy feedstock assessed for the different use cases”, is included in the work package WP 1 “Analysis of variable feedstock to identify challenges for retrofitting” of the project. This report provides the results on the study performed to characterize the material and energy feedstock of steel, aluminium and lead furnace charges, including new or alternative inputs. The study includes, but is not limited to, the following issues: • Analysis of variability of scrap types available or new arising in market • Study of new wastes and alternative charge materials regarding its economic usability • Define elements of interest to detect & quantify (tramp elements, valuable alloying elements…) • Establish metal refining/alloying (micro-addition) requirements Besides these general issues, for each use case some individual tasks of material feedstock analysis were defined: BFI, ▇▇▇ and AMB analysed the variability in the feedstock for the steelmaking use case. The requirements for the steelmaking process with respect to scrap composition in terms of undesired tramp elements (Cu, Sn, P, …) and desired alloy elements (Mn, Cr, Ni, …) were defined. Also, the metallic yield of the different scrap types was analysed. Scrap types with high variability in composition were highlighted. EUT and GRU assessed the inefficiencies in the current production process due to the variability in composition of the Aluminium metal chip feedstock for the aluminium use case.
Introduction and Summary. The Third Sector is the name given to a set of organisations in the voluntary sector ranging from purely volunteer based organisations to social enterprises that generate profit. The dimensions and boundaries of the Third Sector are illustrated in a Sector Landscape diagram - Appendix 3 This Argyll and Bute Third Sector Partnership Agreement (TSP) is to ensure effective collaboration of third sector and community interests in Community Planning Partnership structures and coordination of support services. This agreement covers:
Introduction and Summary. The Public Notice represents the next step in a thorough and conservative process the Commission has undertaken to update the Collocation NPA to account for the latest wireless technologies, specifically wireless facilities that have a minimal potential for adverse effects on historic properties and thus, can be excluded from review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”). During this process, the Commission has concluded that small wireless antennas and their associated equipment, due to their low profile and flexible design options, can be excluded from Section 106 review without significantly increasing the potential for an adverse effect on historic properties or historic districts. 1 Proposed Amended Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas, Public Notice, WT Docket No. 15-180 (2016). 2 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas, 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Appendix B. AT&T supports the Commission’s efforts in this docket and applauds Commission staff for its efforts to appropriately balance the interests represented by the various commenters along with its responsibilities under the NHPA. The proposed modifications will substantially streamline reviews for qualifying small cell facilities, simplifying regulatory processes and allowing for an accelerated timeline for their placement. These steps are important to wireless providers engaged in efforts to densify their wireless networks and will be even more crucial with the anticipated deployment of 5G technologies. In the Public Notice, the Commission proposes modifications to the Collocation NPA to expand the exclusions from Section 106 review for various types of small cell facility deployments. AT&T agrees with the different categories of exclusions within Stipulations VI and VII, though AT&T seeks clarifications about some of the provisions within these stipulations and proposes slight modifications summarized as follows: • Remove the word “small” from the description of the antennas that are excluded because it is redundant, as other conditions define “small” within each Stipulation; • Retain the exclusion for grounding rods, but add language accounting for potential future changes to the National Electrical Code; • Remove proximity restrictions near historic districts because they are unnecessary to protect historic properties within those districts from small cell facilities; • Remove the cumulative limits on sm...
Introduction and Summary. Provide a brief overview of the project, highlighting its significance and how it will enhance the implementation of the Network.
Introduction and Summary. This is the fifth Semi-Annual Report (SAR) and the third that primarily describes the implementation of solution strategies by the Partnerships for Food Industry Development (PFID) for the processing of meat, poultry and seafood. This Project is jointly undertaken by the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (LSU AgCenter), the World Food Logistics Organization (WFLO), the Ukrainian Branch of World Laboratory (World Lab) and the Moldovan National Institute for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine (INZMV). PFID-MSP’s planning process for Year Three (2003) included two meetings and the Project’s response to the USAID Mid-Term Evaluation’s (MTE’s) recommendations. For Year Three, World Lab and INZMV are to provide most of the initiative for project activities, which would focus on meeting the Project’s three implementation objectives: Support Mechanisms, Capacity Building and Fostering Business Partnerships. PFID will repeat this planning procedure to develop its 4th Annual Work Plan (AWP). The MTE’s recommendations included continued focus on international food safety and quality standards and targeted assistance for associations and information support. The MTE recommended discontinued support to production-side assistance activities and a change of PFID-MSP’s management in Moldova. It also recommended a formal marketing program of PFID-MSP for USAID missions.
Introduction and Summary. For many families and individuals, paying the cost of higher education seems like a big challenge. The Advisor-Guided Plan is designed to help you meet that challenge with a tax-advantaged Account. This Disclosure Booklet contains important information that can help you decide whether to open an Account in the Advisor-Guided Plan . You can find the key terms used throughout this Disclosure Booklet in the Glossary, beginning on page 48. This Introduction and Summary provides highlights of the features of the Advisor-Guided Plan and tells you the section and page number where you can find more complete information about each topic. Offered by New York State, the Advisor-Guided Plan lets you save for education expenses by investing in a manner that is tax-advantaged in certain instances. Through your Account, you select and then contribute to one or more of the 31 Investment Options included in the Advisor-Guided Plan. Any investment earnings will grow tax-deferred and your withdrawals from the Account are federally and New York State tax free, provided that the money is used for Qualified Higher Education Expenses at Eligible Educational Institutions. Distributions used to pay for K-12 Tuition Expenses (up to $10,000 annually), Apprenticeship Program Expenses, and Qualified Loan Repayments are tax free under federal law but not New York State law.