Review of Applications Clause Samples
The 'Review of Applications' clause establishes the process by which submitted applications are examined and evaluated by the relevant party or authority. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria, timelines, and procedures for reviewing applications, such as who conducts the review, what documentation is required, and how applicants are notified of decisions. Its core practical function is to ensure a transparent and consistent method for assessing applications, thereby promoting fairness and clarity in the selection or approval process.
Review of Applications. A. The COUNTY’s approval of any payment requested in an Application for Payment will constitute a representation by the COUNTY that to the best of the COUNTY’s knowledge, information and belief:
(i) the Work has progressed to the point indicated;
(ii) the quality of the Work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents, to a final determination of quantities and classifications for Unit Price the Work, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation); and
(iii) the conditions precedent to the CONTRACTOR’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is the COUNTY’s responsibility to observe the Work.
B. The COUNTY’s approval of any payment requested in an Application for Payment will not thereby be deemed to have represented that: (i) inspections made to check the quality or the quantity of the Work performed have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of the Work, or were detailed inspections of the Work; or (ii) there may not be other matters or issues between the parties that might entitle the CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally by the COUNTY or entitle the COUNTY to withhold payment to the CONTRACTOR.
C. The COUNTY may reject the payment request or invoice within 20 (twenty) days after the date on which the payment request or invoice is stamped as received by the COUNTY. The rejection must be in writing and must specify the deficiency in the payment request or invoice and the action necessary to make the payment request or invoice proper. In the latter case, the CONTRACTOR may make the necessary corrections and resubmit the Application.
D. The COUNTY may refuse to make payment of the full amount because:
(i) claims have been made against the COUNTY on account of the CONTRACTOR’s performance or furnishing of the Work;
(ii) Liens have been filed in connection with the Work, except where the CONTRACTOR has delivered a specific Bond satisfactory to the COUNTY to secure the satisfaction and discharge of such Liens;
(iii) there are other items entitling the COUNTY to a set-off against the amount recommended.
(iv) the Work is defective or the completed Work has been damaged, requiring correction or replacement;
(v) the Work for which payment is requested cannot be verified;
(vi) the CONTRACTOR failed to make proper payments to s...
Review of Applications. A. Within 10 days after receipt of each application for payment, the Engineer will either indicate in writing a recommendation for payment and present the application for payment to Owner or return the application for payment to Contractor indicating in writing Engineer’s reasons for refusing to recommend payment. The Contractor will make the necessary corrections and resubmit the application for payment.
B. Engineer will recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) which, in the opinion of the Engineer, are necessary to protect Owner from loss because the Work is defective and requires correction or replacement.
C. The Owner is entitled to impose set-offs against payment based on any claims that have been made against Owner on account of Contractor’s conduct in the performance of the Work, incurred costs, losses, or damages on account of Contractor’s conduct in the performance of the Work, or liquidated damages that have accrued as a result of Contractor’s failure to complete the Work.
Review of Applications. Contractor shall review with Customer any application relating to import or export that Contractor makes to any government department, agency, or entity for any approval, permit, license, or agreement, as may be required for performance of the Work, prior to submission of such application. Contractor shall provide Customer a minimum of five Business Days to review such application prior to submission to such governmental entity, and Contractor shall in good faith consider and accommodate any comments and proposed revisions made by Customer for incorporation into such application. Customer shall reasonably cooperate with Contractor in Contractor’s efforts to procure all such approvals, permits, licenses, and agreements.
Review of Applications. 1. ENGINEER will, within 10 days after receipt of each Application for Payment, either indicate in writing a recommendation of payment and present the Application to OWNER or return the Application to CONTRACTOR indicating in writing ENGINEER’s reasons for refusing to recommend payment. In the latter case, CONTRACTOR may make the necessary corrections and resubmit the Application.
2. ENGINEER’s recommendation of any payment requested in an Application for Payment will constitute a representation by ENGINEER to OWNER, based on ENGINEER’s observations on the Site of the executed Work as an experienced and qualified design professional and on ENGINEER's review of the Application for Payment and the accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of ENGINEER’s knowledge, information and belief:
Review of Applications. (a) Contractor shall review with Customer any application relating to import or export that Contractor makes to any government department, agency, or entity for any approval, permit, license, or agreement, as may be required for performance of the Work, prior to submission of such application. Contractor shall provide Customer a minimum of [**Redacted**] to review such application prior to submission to such governmental entity, and Contractor shall in good faith consider and accommodate any comments and proposed revisions made by Customer for incorporation into such application.
(b) Customer shall reasonably cooperate with Contractor in Contractor’s efforts to procure all such approvals, permits, licenses, and agreements.
Review of Applications. The TNRCC shall be responsible for the administrative review of all wastewater and storm water discharge permit applications within the TNRCC's jurisdiction. TNRCC will make completeness determinations and inform permittees of their application status, and that application information will be coded into PCS.
Review of Applications. 1. City will, after receipt of each Application for Payment, either indicate in writing a recommendation of payment or return the Application to Contractor indicating reasons for refusing payment. In the latter case, Contractor may make the necessary corrections and resubmit the Application.
2. City’s processing of any payment requested in an Application for Payment will be based on City’s observations of the executed Work, and on City’s review of the Application for Payment and the accompanying data and schedules, that to the best of City’s knowledge:
Review of Applications. Upon receipt of the Classification/Reclassification application, the committee shall complete a review of the application and render a decision in writing to the employee.
Review of Applications. Review of applications will occur in three rounds before being invited to participate in Finals during 43North Week. 43North Week will run from October24, 2021 to October 29, 2021. Applicants must fill out, complete and submit a written application, including uploaded business documentation, via the 43North website. In the first round, 43North working in collaboration with its panels of judges (the “Committee”) will select promising applications from the pool of applicants by July 19 at Noon EST, 2021. Such selections shall be made in the sole and absolute discretion of 43North working with the Committee. 43North shall be entitled to begin conducting background checks during the first round on applicants who are identified as semifinalists and may request the consent of applicants for these checks.
Review of Applications. (a) Where applicable, the Selection Committee shall complete the equivalencies process as per Article 15.2 for each applicant who has requested an equivalency.
(b) The Selection Committee shall review all applications and develop a long list of ap- plicants who align minimally with the qualifications for the position according to the advertisement.
(c) The ▇▇▇▇’▇/Director’s Office shall send the names and emails of the applicants on the long list to the Diversity and Human Rights Advisor (DHRA). The DHRA will send an EDI self-identification questionnaire to each applicant. The questionnaires shall be collected and maintained in confidence by the DHRA.
(d) The DHRA shall inform the Selection Committee whether each applicant on the long list has self-identified in one (1) or more of the designated groups. No information con- necting any applicant to a particular designated group shall be shared with the Selec- tion Committee. The Selection Committee shall consider the qualifications as out- lined in the advertisement and the EDI information provided by the DHRA and the Faculty/Unit EDI goals and plans (see Article 15.1) in determining which applicants are invited to interview.
(e) The Selection Committee shall invite a minimum of three (3) candidates to interview. In exceptional circumstances where the Selection Committee identifies fewer than three