Candidate Evaluation Sample Clauses

Candidate Evaluation. An automated staffing process shall be used to assign a score based on applicants’ answers to assessment questions. Narrative responses may be required to support applicants’ responses. In order to assure full consideration, the application must include all information and documentation specified in the vacancy announcement. This may include information such as awards, training, education, employment, and outside activities. For all vacancies covered by this Article, the candidate’s most recent appraisal will be used.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Candidate Evaluation. 1) An automated staffing process shall be used. The automated system will assign a score based on applicants’ answers to the assessment questions. The applicant’s relevant education, training, experience, awards, and accomplishments, as documented in their application package shall be considered. The rating and ranking process that the Employer uses will be in accordance with all laws, rules, and regulations. 2) If the Employer decides that the applicant does not meet basic eligibility for the position because of lack of education, training, or specialized experience, the Employer will notify the employee in writing which basic eligibility requirement(s) were not met. 3) The applicant will be advised that they may submit a request for reconsideration within three
View SourceView Similar (2)
Candidate Evaluation. Unless ot herwise agreed, Rapallo will invoice the client regularly f rom details shown on an approved timesheet. following the client’s acceptance of a candidate and an In response to an enquiry from a client for the services of a
View Source
Candidate Evaluation. (1) An automated staffing process shall be used. The automated system will assign a score based on applicants’ answers to the assessment questions. The applicant’s relevant education, training, experience, awards and accomplishments, as documented in her/his application package shall be considered. The rating and ranking process that the Employer uses will be in accordance with all laws, rules and regulations. (2) If the Employer decides that the applicant does not meet basic eligibility for the position because of lack of education, training, or specialized experience, the Employer will notify the employee in writing which basic eligibility requirement(s) were not met. (3) The applicant will be advised that she/he may submit a request for reconsideration within three (3) business days of receipt of the not qualified notification, identifying the material contained in the original application which she/he believes was not considered and is qualifying. (4) If the selecting official chooses to fill a unit position with an applicant who is not presently a federal employee, e.g., via an OPM appointment certificate, the selecting official will upon written request of any bargaining unit employee who was rated Best Qualified, but not selected, articulate in writing, with sufficient clarity, a nondiscriminatory, merit-based reason for the employee’s non-selection, within 5 business days of notification of non-selection. [this section effective May 13, 2015] (5) [Subject to FLRA negotiability appeal] (6) Upon request, the Employer will give the Union a copy of the documentation showing the 5 CFR Part 300 validation of the plan/guide, as well as any analysis of the impact of the plan/guide under the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978): 43 Federal Register 38295 (August 25, 1978). All information that is collected in the application process will conform to 5 CFR Part 300. In addition, the Employer will ensure that this process is consistent with and follows the guidelines outlined in Part 60- 3, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. [this section effective May 13, 2015]
View Source
Candidate Evaluation. An automated staffing process shall be used. The automated system will assign a score based on applicants’ answers to the assessment questions.
View Source

Related to Candidate Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.