Project Methodology Clause Samples

The Project Methodology clause defines the structured approach and processes that will be followed to complete a project. It typically outlines the specific methods, frameworks, or standards to be used, such as Agile, Waterfall, or a custom hybrid, and may detail phases, deliverables, and responsibilities. By clearly establishing how the project will be managed and executed, this clause ensures all parties have a shared understanding of expectations, reducing confusion and helping to keep the project on track.
Project Methodology. [Insert description of Project methodology (attach additional pages if required)]
Project Methodology. The project that ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & Associates, Inc. is proposing will be comprised of the following separate components: Component A: Projection of the residential, commercial, and industrial development. Component B: Identification of student yield factors for residential, commercial, and industrial development. Component C: Generation of enrollment projections based on natural growth and new residential development. Component D: Identification of existing facility capacity, facility needs, and facility costs based on enrollment projections. Class size reduction implementation may affect District capacity. Component E: Preparation of documentation in compliance with current developer fee law. In order to identify the projected student impact of residential, commercial, and industrial development, it is necessary to assess the impact of development. This component of the study will identify the level of future residential, commercial, and industrial development anticipated to occur in the District. ▪ Identify approved and tentative development projects on file with the county and city planning departments where applicable. ▪ Identify development potential for vacant and under- developed land. ▪ Identify city building densities, current zoning, and master plan designations to establish build-out potentials. ▪ Provide development projections for single family residential and multiple family residential development. Provide projections of commercial and industrial development by category. ▪ Determine the development impact on the District when pre- existing dwelling units are demolished and replaced by reconstructed dwelling units as it occurs within the District boundaries. ▪ Project fee revenues for residential, commercial and industrial based on the current maximum fee. State default student yields will be utilized or student generation rates (SGR's) will be calculated to project the student impact of future development. The commercial/industrial SGR's will address employee generation factors, as provided by the San Diego Traffic Generation documentation (17621(e)(1)(B)).
Project Methodology. 6.1. For clarity, the parties acknowledge and agree that each Project has different requirements which may evolve over time and accordingly: 6.1.1. Unless expressly set out in the Service Order Form, the Supplier will propose what it considers to be a suitable methodology following Good Industry Practice based on the needs of the Customer at the time. The Supplier shall provide a reasonably detailed summary of its proposed methodologies and ways of working upon request by the Customer. Such determination may take into account differing levels of priority as to duration, cost, efficiency, level of creative input required etc and where applicable the Supplier shall maintain a Backlog to record any parts of the services which are de-prioritised for later delivery and shall keep the Customer informed and updated as the Backlog changes; 6.1.2. Either the Supplier, Customer or the Product Owner may, from time to time during the Project Term, request a change to the priority of the Deliverables or request a change to the Project Methodology specified in the relevant Service Order Form or otherwise adopted by the Supplier in relation to a Project. Subject to an agreement in writing between the Supplier and one of the Product Manager or the Customer, such a change may not require a formal Change Request if the Supplier confirms that there would be no impact on the scope or cost of the Project; 6.1.3. the Product Owner must submit any other change as part of a Change Request to the Supplier for approval. 6.2. The Product Owner and the Project Team shall use all reasonable endeavours to agree the Acceptance Criteria for applicable Deliverables as soon as possible following the Commencement Date for each Project, or as soon as possible after the applicable Deliverable is proposed during the Project. 6.3. Once the Deliverables to be included in the Project have been agreed any changes may be subject to a formal Change Request: 6.4. Where the Project Methodology requires, the Supplier shall keep the Customer updated as to its progress in relation to each applicable Deliverable or the progression of Requirements and the status of the Backlog where relevant. The Supplier may provide access to a project planning/management system at its discretion from time to time, such as Jira. 6.5. The Project shall be complete once all Deliverables are Accepted and/or the Result is deemed to substantially meet the Requirements by either party acting reasonably (“Completion”). Please se...
Project Methodology. ▪ General The Contractor is responsible for carrying out all activities and supplying everything necessary to provide the Works in accordance with the requirements of the Works Information. This includes clarifying and co-ordination with plant engineers, and the Employers Representative. A fully integrated, working system is provided which meets safety, reliability and operability criteria and performs all modulating control, binary control, safety and protection functions and supervisory functions as detailed in the Works Information. It is the responsibility of the Contractor throughout the execution of the different contract activities to addressed to and obtain acceptance from the Employers Representative: ▪ Construction on Site The works forming part of the testing and commissioning, is not embarked on until the Employers Representative’s acceptance has been obtained for construction and erection work performed in this stage. ▪ Installation, Inspection and Testing This stage is the installation, inspection and testing of all supplied items forming part of the whole of the works. This stage includes all field equipment and testing system functionality. Such tests as may be required by the Employers Representative are carried out by the Contractor after erection to prove compliance with the Works Information irrespective of any tests, which may have been carried out at the manufacturer’s factory. The Employer reserves the right to appoint representatives to inspect all parts during erection and to be present at any of the tests specified. The Employers Representative is free to specify hold and witness points during the installation and testing stages of the project. The Contractor issues preliminary notification of such hold and witness points to the Employers Representative, and confirms such hold and witness points at least seven days prior to the test activity. The Contractor provides the entire test Equipment required for site testing. ▪ Commissioning This is defined as bringing into service all items of the works as specified, meeting the requirements of the functional Works Information and plant performance including all necessary testing and verification of the stated performance. The equipment covered by the Works Information is installed and complete in all respects by the dates stated in the Accepted Programme. The Contractor commissions the installed system according to his commissioning procedures that will be handed to the Employers Repres...
Project Methodology. The Contractor shall submit a detailed proposal outlining methodologies of how he intends executing the work.
Project Methodology. A collective impact facilitation approach was utilized throughout the project to ensure all voices were heard. This included one primary facilitator, a core “leadership team”, and project partners. An initial literature review and content research was conducted for historical understanding followed by two national surveys. The first survey was conducted as an initial assessment to understand common knowledge categories in food systems through open ended questions. The second survey related to competency-based learning objectives and identification of curricula that currently exists that met those objectives.
Project Methodology. In the dozens of prior projects where PFM and the project team have been engaged by state and large local governments to do this type of analysis, there are several general themes that run through the work. It should be noted that the exact methodology will depend on the specific needs of the Task Force – they are not specifically outlined in the RFP. However, based on our past experience, we would identify the following as key tasks and activities. The general methodology used to complete the tasks and activities associated with them are explained, as well as the PFM project approach for them.  Analysis of the ‘as is’ state tax structure and system. PFM will first use a detailed information request (primarily consisting of state budget, finance and tax data) as well as review of relevant information related to the state economy and tax structure. PFM subject matter experts will also conduct structured interviews/meetings with key state subject matter experts and stakeholders to gain a full understanding of the current system and its ramifications.  Research and analysis related to key tax data and metrics. The tax structure is, of course, an important component of state government operations (in its role of providing the resources to run it), but it also is an important component of the state’s economy and how it interacts with and impacts citizens and businesses. PFM will use a variety of commonly accessed data sources (such as the US Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Federal Reserve Banks and others) to identify key issues, such as how the revenue structure impacts on the overall economy, how it performs in differing parts of the business cycle and how it will likely perform in the future based on current expectations related to economic, social and demographic trends.
Project Methodology. Bin inspection audits will be undertaken pre and post the project. The region’s target is to have a diversion rate of greater than 40%. Success will be measured against our diversion target.
Project Methodology. Chase will utilize a disciplined systems life cycle (SLC) methodology on all applications development projects performed for NEW TRUSTCO. Within 90 days after Commencement Date, Chase will provide NEW TRUSTCO with details of the SLC methodology to be used for review and comment. Chase and NEW TRUSTCO will jointly agree on any appropriate modifications to the SLC methodology. The Chase SLC methodology will include the following elements:
Project Methodology. Tailored Prince2 will be used in the management of the initiative and support provided by the City Region Deal Programme Manager.