Gap Analysis Clause Samples

Gap Analysis. Assess demand for SWM services

Gap Analysis. Contractor shall: • Perform a gap analysis to document current process and map those processes to the functionality of the System. • Document how the existing processes will change with the System. • Capture the current process narrative, the new process narrative, and the summary of the change between the two. • Develop and review as-is processes with the Oregon Votes County Subcommittee. • Develop and deliver job and process maps that identifies needed organizational changes in order to optimize the value realized by the System. Contractor shall provide the following:

Gap Analysis. The CONSULTANT shall perform a GAP analysis between the current CITY capabilities and where the CITY should expect to be to meet the projected regulatory requirements. The CONSULTANT will prepare specific recommendations for enhanced data collection methodologies, necessary technology improvements, and enhancement to existing data systems or recommendations for a third party software solution, such as use of an analytics and business intelligence system. a. CITY will provide examples of all current field data collection forms, descriptions of existing data systems, existing technology capabilities, and examples of all regulatory reports. b. CONSULTANT has knowledge of field data collection technologies currently being used by other natural gas distribution utilities and various software systems. Task 5 Deliverable(s): 5.1 Draft master plan chapter 5.2 GAP analysis 5.3 - Recommendations for enhanced data collection and analysis TASK 6 – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CONSULTANT will develop a Capital Improvements Plan, as follows: 6.1 Develop list of improvement projects recommended from Tasks 2 through 6. Develop capital cost estimates for all improvements. CONSULTANT will develop Feasibility Study Level Opinions of Probable Cost. These Costs Opinions will be prepared to Class 5 Cost Estimate Levels based on the definition provided by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) International Recommended Practice No. 18R-97. 6.2 Develop a spreadsheet model for prioritization of improvement projects; prioritization will be based on multiple criteria including, but not limited to, required timing to meet projected capacity shortfalls; required timing for renewal or replacement projects based on risk factors and anticipated useful life of existing infrastructure; available revenues; and timing of optimization improvements to maximize life-cycle cost savings. Spreadsheet model will be dynamic to allow for adjustments to service goals, remaining useful life, risk scores and available revenues, in order to establish a Capital Improvements Plan that can be implemented within available revenues. Task 6 Deliverable(s): 6.1 Draft master plan chapter 6.2 Capital Improvements Plan spreadsheet model TASK 7 - MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT CONSULTANT will assemble the results from each of the previously identified tasks into an overall GAS Master Plan Draft Report. The Draft Report will include, identified recommended improvements to the natural gas infrastructur...

Gap Analysis. The Qualtrics platform provides a single data collection system and is used by various large school districts across the country including Orange County, FL, Chicago Public Schools, and Austin Independent School District, as well as postsecondary institutions such as University of North Florida. The application continues to stay current on strategies that assist the end user in reaching the stakeholder. Distribution methods included in the platform include reusable web links, individual web links, text message invitations, email distribution, and social media distributions. The variety of distribution methods, as well as having no limitations for the amount of distributions performed within a time period for either the license or the individual user, allows for an increase of the audience base and a higher rate of responses. This platform also allows for a mixed used of data collection, such as professional development evaluations, advanced heat mapping capabilities, and online forms with signature capabilities. All data collection is also tested with advanced mobile device responsiveness, allowing the user to access the tool from a mobile device.

Gap Analysis. 29 Appendices.................................................................................................... 32 Appendix 1. Roles and Responsibilities for Enterprise Architecture Processes................................ 32 Appendix 2. EWTA Domain Ratification and Maintenance Process................................................ 32 Appendix 3. EWTA Exception Management and Compliance Process................................................ 32 GOVERNANCE DOMAIN ARCHITECTURE ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT The Governance Domain details the principles, organizations, roles and responsibilities, services, processes and the workflow for the PacifiCare Health Systems (PacifiCare) Enterprise Architecture (EA).

Gap Analysis. A GAP analysis is a tool in business and economics that is used to achieve certain goals. In this analysis the workers compare the company’s actual performance with the potential performance. The main questions that need to be answered and compared before performing a gap analysis are: • Where are we now? This is the descriptive analysis where we can see how it is today. • Where do we want to be? This is the normative analysis where we explain how the potential performance is supposed to be after what we have observed. The main question to solve the gap analysis is: • How to get there? Here we have to explain how to delete the gap between the descriptive and the normative analysis. (Ehow website, 2011) As shown in Figure 29, the goal of a GAP analysis is to find the GAP between the optimized allocation and the current level of allocation. When the company has found this GAP, their goal is to close this by using different strategies and procedures (Digoo website, 2011). The quality of the analysis is best if you involve staff from as many areas as possible in the company, so that multiple perspectives will appear. This helps the company to get an insight in which areas that can be improved. The basis for the analysis work is interviews with employees. These interviews are tailored to each individual employee and their responsibilities and knowledge area, so that the analysis will have a result where most of the areas are involved. These results from the analysis are a good basis for the management to do good decisions, both on short and long term decisions (Det norske veritas Website, 2011).

Gap Analysis. The Consultant will review and assess existing Port Authority processes and policies in place relating to safety by meeting with appropriate Port Authority staff. Documents will be reviewed and interviews will be conducted to collect vital information. The gap analysis will include the following: • Policy and Statement • Policy Objectives • Staff and Stakeholder Roles & Responsibilities • Safety Reporting Program • Management Reporting and Frequency • Document Controls and Retention • Data Collection and Hazard Analysis • Safety Promotion Program • Existing Training (including initial and refresher) Program and Tracking • Existing Safety Programs and Policies • Process for periodic review and revision This task will be documented in a summary report and will be essential in establishing an accurate baseline for the OH&S Management System. This review will then compare results with OSHA regulatory compliance and industry best practices.

Gap Analysis. Profile of country and data availability, EEA39 and HarmoSnow o Large snow depth observation networks exist in EEA39 and HarmoSnow countries, but large amounts of potentially available snow data is not reported on GTS and is often not available outside the country of origin (Figure 3) o No SYNOP messages from Andorra o Lack of information from Kosovo and Malta: ▪ not included in the HarmoSnow study ▪ no snow SYNOP data from Malta, other variables instead. Based on the location, snow observations maybe not essential ▪ no SYNOP messages from Kosovo o SYNOP snow depth data from Netherlands not available but the snow depth observation network information is represented in HarmoSnow o Based on responses to the HarmoSnow questionnaire (incl. 60 Insitutions) ▪ Metadata not available in 29% of the cases ▪ Snow observation data not available in 25% of the cases o Data produced by institutions other than national weather services seems to be shared more rarely than by operational weather services • Profile of snow parameters, HarmoSnow o Clear gap between snow depth data available via GTS and nationally o Observation networks of parameters other than snow depth sparse o Direct observations on fractional snow cover (FSC) are not provided (may be only in Finland) ▪ FSC typically varies rather widely in space and time, and therefore single point observations are not necessarily representative of the local spatial variation. This representation also depends on the landscape characteristics and other prevailing conditions. The observations should be conducted over an area corresponding to the pixel size of the applied satellite sensor, and the timing should match the satellite overpass, at least so that no major changes in snow cover occur o Presence of snow is operatively produced (manually) by many European countries as state of ground. The information is indicated as e-code in BUFR- messages and is available via GTS. However, part of the data is still only nationally available • Other recognized issues: o In situ snow observations are sparse; vast snow covered areas are hardly accessible o Limited coverage through automatic in situ snow measurement methods o Lack of centralized and institutionalized coordination of the snow measurement activities at national and European level o There are no coordinated long-term snow measurement strategies in Europe o Lack of harmonized snow measurements and reporting practices in Europe o Identifying key responsible persons / instit...

Gap Analysis. The study required under sub- section (d) shall include a gap analysis to determine if State and local laws and resources are adequate to deter or otherwise address the crimes of violence de- scribed in subsection (a) and recommendations on how to address any identified gaps.’’ Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1915, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3555, provided that: