Evaluation and Training Clause Samples
Evaluation and Training. 9.3.5.1 The Assistant to the Principal evaluation as a teacher will not be based upon performance in the position of Assistant to the Principal.
9.3.5.2 The District will, in a timely manner, develop a training program for assistants. The time required for such training may be release time.
Evaluation and Training. A. At least once each year, the Agent Program shall submit a self−assessment in a format determined by the DATCP by September 30th. The DATCP may waive the self-assessment requirement in a year where the DATCP conducts an evaluation. The DATCP shall evaluate the Agent Program based on the following required information in the self−assessment:
1. The Agent Program’s compliance with the MOA terms.
2. The Agent Program’s progress in meeting program standards adopted by the DATCP.
3. The Agent Program’s records and reports required pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 74.20.
B. The DATCP shall conduct an evaluation, at least once every three years, to assess the Agent’s compliance with the provisions of this MOA, program standards set by the DATCP, and applicable statutes and administrative rules. The DATCP may conduct the evaluation process at any reasonable time and shall give the Agent reasonable advance notice. The evaluation process shall include an office component and a field component. The office component shall include, but is not limited to, review of the agent program plan, ordinances, regulations, inspection reports, complaints, budget information, and other required documentation. The field component shall include DATCP personnel performing maintenance standardization with the sanitarian who is the Agent Standard, as well as evaluating other sanitarians, if applicable.
C. In addition to the required evaluation, the DATCP may perform additional evaluations of the Agent’s performance at any reasonable time with reasonable advance notice.
D. The DATCP shall provide the Agent program with the DATCP’s written findings based on the review of the self−assessment or an evaluation. The DATCP may, as deemed necessary, increase the evaluation frequency.
E. The Agent shall submit to the DATCP any required corrective action plan detailing how the Agent will meet MOA requirements.
F. The DATCP shall review the corrective action plan and may make additional comments or approve the corrective action plan if deemed acceptable.
G. The Agent shall document progress on the approved corrective action plan on their next one or two yearly self-assessments as necessary.
H. The Agent shall incorporate the approved corrective action plan in its Agent Program Plan.
I. If the Agent fails to meet the conditions specified in the corrective action plan, the DATCP shall:
1. Notify the Agent, in writing, of the deficiencies in meeting the corrective action plan and place the MOA i...
Evaluation and Training. The Assistant’s evaluation as a teacher will not be based upon 5 performance in the position of Assistant to the Principal.
Evaluation and Training. 1. The Employer and the Union share the goal of developing a staff of the highest possible caliber. To this end the employees recognize their responsibility to develop their potential for excellence, and the Employer recognizes that excellence cannot be achieved without a thoughtful and democratically developed plan for the development of performance standards and expectations, training, supervision, mentoring and evaluation.
2. The parties are committed to meeting the Performance Standards previously adopted by the Society and all future amendments adopted pursuant to the Society’s procedure for Project forums.
3. The Employer shall establish a permanent periodic formal performance evaluation process in furtherance of the goals articulated by the parties in paragraph 1 of this Article. The permanent periodic formal evaluation process shall be established through an Employer- employee task force which develops the process to be adopted pursuant to Project Forum procedure, subject to Board approval.
4. To the fullest extent possible, the permanent periodic formal evaluation process shall seek to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ candor and openness in order to be a means of enhancing professional development. Therefore, in the ordinary instance, problems in performance identified as a result of the evaluation process shall be resolved through establishment of a mutually cooperative work plan between the Employer and employee which will lead to the desired change in performance.
5. When the Employer determines that an employee has failed to perform with merit, the Employer shall:
(a) Comply with the other requirements of this Article;
(b) Promptly meet with the employee, discuss the problems and develop a corrective plan which shall be summarized in writing; and
(c) Assure that the requirements of paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14 of this Article have been or are being met with respect to this employee.
6. If the disciplining of an employee as the result of a performance evaluation is unavoidable, any such disciplining shall be subject to the requirements of Article 22, including but not limited to the provisions in Article 22, paragraphs 2 and 3 on progressive penalties and on procedure (including but not limited to notice and training or other appropriate opportunity for corrective action).
7. The Employer recognizes appropriate training for all staff members is a fundamental element of its responsibilities and the Union recognizes appropriate training is a fundamental element of empl...