Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Sample Clauses
The 'Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning' clause establishes the requirement for ongoing assessment and review of a project's progress and outcomes. It typically outlines the methods and frequency for collecting data, evaluating results against objectives, and incorporating lessons learned into future activities. This clause ensures that both parties remain accountable for project performance and enables continuous improvement by systematically identifying successes and areas for adjustment.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. In the Annexes to this report, Table 2 “Tracking Table” reports the progress on three of the Project’s indicators (it is worth noting that, for information purposes, we include indicator updates that are usually reported only once a year). Table 3 details the training events that were held during the quarter, Table 4 and 5 detail the technical and communication products that have been developed by the project; and the Table 6 shows the appearance in news media related to the intervention of the project. The Annex 7 shows an analysis of participation in the training events and webinars organized by the project, and finally, Annex 8 details the specifications of the courses that have been organized.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. Provision of support for a national unified monitoring approach, as well as monitoring of Project activities, including:
1. Provision of financing for engagement of a Third-Party Monitoring Agent for monitoring activities carried out under Parts 1 and 2.1 of the Project, including monitoring all activities related to Project COVID-19 Vaccine delivery and deployment.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. Carry out the following scaled-up activities and the following Additional Parts so as to support a national unified monitoring approach, as well as monitoring of Project activities, including:
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. 1. Establishment and operation of a national unified health service delivery monitoring approach, including: (a) development of a master health services functionality database for services provided by donors in the Republic of South Sudan; (b) collection and development of verified data in the health services sector; (c) generation of health service functionality bulletins and/or reports;
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. The ▇▇▇ team monitored GRAIN-supported events as well as field trials. A total of 86 visits were made in four provinces (Kabul, Balkh, Herat, and Nangarhar). The monitoring team used tailored checklists for all monitoring visits in the areas of technical implementation, environmental compliance, financial compliance, and sustainability. Program participant feedback was also sought. Findings were reviewed by program management. Regular bi-weekly coordination meetings conducted between ▇▇▇ and program teams and based on findings, changes were incorporated into programming as required for program improvement.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. (this Contract). This component will assure validity of TDDAP2 results reporting, generate actionable learning which can be applied to programme decision-making to maximise effectiveness and minimise risk; and perform any other relevant ▇▇▇ activities as detailed in this ToR.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. During Quarter 1 GRAIN finalized a sub-agreement with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ International Consulting to provide Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (▇▇▇) support to the GRAIN project. This sub-award has two primary functions. The first is to lead the design and implementation of all aspects of the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning plan. staff will be embedded in the GRAIN project in Kabul (▇▇▇ Director, and Specialist) and at all provincial locations (4 ▇▇▇ Officers). staff will work with technical staff to develop ▇▇▇ tools, collect data, monitor activities, conduct learning activities, report data and findings to Kabul, and prepare submissions for Afghan info. The second function of this award is to develop a data management system for use at ARIA. This system will allow ARIA staff to capture, store and analyze wheat research data. Currently ARIA has no such system for research data, which limits the amount of analysis and recommendations that can be gleaned from their work. The sub-award includes development of the system, hands-on training and troubleshooting support. In an effort to ensure sustainability, staff will work alongside ARIA staff throughout the project to capture and submit ▇▇▇▇’s wheat research data in the system. This provides an opportunity for continual on-the-job learning and can lead to greater sustainability and a smoother transition of responsibility for the Data Management System for ARIA. As part of their sub-award, is developing a transition and sustainability plan for the ARIA database. This plan will be completed in the next quarter. GRAIN will use one database to capture both ▇▇▇▇’s wheat research data as well as project reporting data. Appropriate user access will be developed so any data that is strictly related to the GRAIN project can be firewalled from unauthorized access. Using one database improves cost effectiveness by reducing duplication (two separate systems recording the same data) and helps ensure data consistency. For example, many factors go into an indicator such as percent increase in yield (date of sowing, weather conditions, pest/disease condition, experimental treatment etc.). By using the same data management system, and GRAIN will also be able to mentor and coach ARIA staff to utilize the captured data to generate higher quality products from the data and support them in developing research materials and extension products. Additionally, the GRAIN team continued to work with over the quarter to revise the ▇▇▇ pl...
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. The supplier will develop a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (▇▇▇) strategy and a comprehensive Results Framework (RF) during the Inception phase. The RF should include logical framework indicators compliant with FCDO requirements. However, this will be designed in such a way that supports the adaptive management approach required for this programme i.e. high level outcomes will be fixed, but output level indicators will be more flexible and will build in measurement of learning and adaption across the programme – meaning that the programme is assessed on the what it is achieving but also on the how it is going about implementation. Alongside a results framework, we also encourage use of alternative approaches to programme monitoring and learning as part of the programme’s results framework. This should be able to capture a) the qualitative changes the programme is working towards; b) the programme’s secondary contributions to targeted sectors/programmes; c) the programme’s responsiveness on cross-cutting issues such as gender equity, social inclusion, disability, youth, and conflict mitigation; d) ways of working including learning feedback loops and coalition building. In line with FCDO’s commitment to inclusion of women, people with disabilities and young people, the results framework should include specific indicators linked to engagement of women/youth under each output and should systematically factor in beneficiary feedback as part of its adaptive programming. Monitoring of the programme should incorporate both partners’ performance and compliance and the processes of change the project seeks to work it. It should also aim to capture not only the contributions and achievements of individual initiatives but also the collective outputs and outcomes that the programme as a whole is able to contribute to. Most importantly, it should also facilitate reflection on the programme’s approach, and enable the project manager and partners to recognise what is not working and make course corrections during implementation. FCDO does not expect that every pro-accountability initiative will succeed, so the monitoring system needs to enable the project manager to recognise and manage failure effectively. This programme is housed within FCDO Mozambique’s TAcID programme, which will have its own overarching RF and M&E framework. The supplier is expected to contribute to discussions on the development of the TAcID RF and ▇▇▇ strategy and to agree on a methodology th...
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. During this quarter, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ developed a comprehensive ▇▇▇ plan complete with indicator reference sheets and indicator performance tracking table. The selection of performance indicators was done during the start workshop where all the partners met to select indicators and set targets across IRs. This was a participatory approach that saw sub-awardee IR leads facilitate the process of indicator selection. Through this collaborative process, consensus on the performance measures and targets was quickly reached. The ▇▇▇ plan was submitted within 90 days and is currently under review by USAID. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ commenced plans to undertake a baseline population-based household survey in this reporting quarter. The baseline process started with development of a scope of work, followed by request for proposal-posted in the local dailies and online site for international audience. The RFP was closed on December 21, 2018. Currently, the ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ team is reviewing proposals from potential candidates. Fieldwork is expected to start in quarter two. The following are activities planned for the next quarter: • Conduct baseline population-based household survey covering activity operations areas of Dodoma, Morogoro, Rukwa and Iringa • Working with SC's DCOP/Technical Advisors and partners to develop routine monitoring tools to facilitate data capture during activity implementation. • Train ▇▇▇ Coordinators and partners on ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ M&E system/M&E approaches, indicator requirements, data collection process/tools and data quality management
6. SPECIAL EVENTS FOR NEXT QUARTER ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ upcoming events include: • Project launch and introductions and project implementation planning (PIP) meetings at regional levels. • Kick of meeting for all ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ activity project staff. This meeting will focus on orienting the new staff on the activity approaches, WASH, SBC and gender integration. Technical advisors from Save the Children USA and Manoff Group will be leading the WASH and SBC and gender integration respectively How ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ has Addressed A/COR Comments from the Last Quarterly or Semi-Annual Report Not applicable in this reporting quarter. This is ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ first quarter.
7. FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning. The Borrower shall ensure that the PMU develops a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning system, compatible with the IFAD Results and Impact Management System within twelve (12) months from the date of entry into force of this Agreement, thereby allowing for the appropriate determination of the outcomes and impact of the Project components. A base line survey shall be undertaken within nine (9) months from the date of entry into force of this Agreement.